Who can forget the Blue Book?
|
| 
| If these academic responsibilities are analogous to work and the performances of our intercollegiate athletes analogous to play, isn't it peculiar that the effect they have on the respective participants are so similar? Let me elaborate. Intercollegiate contests are the final exams for an athlete. After spending the season to-date attending practice, learning, working and preparing for this appointed pre-game moment, an athlete finds a seat in the lockerroom, checks their uniform and equipment, glances at the time left until game time, looks around at their silent fellow teammates, waits for the coach to address the team and for any last minute words of advice, and wipes their sweaty palms. So work or play, it doesn't matter. The preliminary ritual is simply about the human experience of being tested. There is, however, an added element of discomfort in the athletic environment, namely, taking this test in front of an audience (teammates and fans) and displaying the results for all to see. But the fact is that we need this testing, we yearn for it. Without it, we never know how good we are, nor how good we can be. There is one other similarity -- when it is all over and you have done your best. It feels sooo good. Good luck Hoyas! |